Cs. Miller et al., SELECTIVE INTERFERENCE WITH PACEMAKER ACTIVITY BY ELECTRICAL DENTAL DEVICES, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology and endodontics, 85(1), 1998, pp. 33-36
Citations number
22
Categorie Soggetti
Pathology,Surgery,"Dentistry,Oral Surgery & Medicine
Objective. We sought to determine whether electromagnetic interference
with cardiac pacemakers occurs during the operation of contemporary e
lectrical dental equipment. Study Design, Fourteen electrical dental d
evices were tested in vitro for their ability to interfere with the fu
nction of two Medtronics cardiac pacemakers (one a dual-chamber, bipol
ar Thera 7942 pacemaker, the other a single-chamber, unipolar Minix 83
40 pacemaker). Atrial and Ventricular pacemaker output and electrocard
iographic activity were monitored by means of telemetry with the use o
f a Medtronics 9760/90 programmer. Results. Atrial and ventricular pac
ing were inhibited by electromagnetic interference produced by the ele
ctrosurgical unit up to a distance of 10 cm, by the ultrasonic bath cl
eaner up to 30 cm, and by the magnetorestrictive ultrasonic scalers up
to 37.5 cm. in contrast, operation of the amalgamator, electric pulp
tester, composite curing light, dental handpieces, electric toothbrush
, microwave oven, dental chair and light, ENAC ultrasonic instrument,
radiography unit, and sonic scaler did not alter pacing rate or rhythm
. Conclusions. These results suggest that certain electrosurgical and
ultrasonic instruments may produce deleterious effects in medically fr
agile patients with cardiac pacemakers.