Ra. Kloner et al., SAFETY OF LONG-ACTING DIHYDROPYRIDINE CALCIUM-CHANNEL BLOCKERS IN HYPERTENSIVE PATIENTS, The American journal of cardiology, 81(2), 1998, pp. 163-169
Issues raised recently concerning the safety of calcium channel blocke
rs (CCBs) prompted an analysis of the occurrence of cardiovascular eve
nts and death in the Pfizer Inc. hypertension clinical trial databases
for amlodipine (Norvasc) and nifedipine in the gastrointestinal thera
peutic system (GITS) formulation (Procardia XL). Prospectively defined
analyses of data from comparative and noncomparative trials of amlodi
pine and nifedipine GITS were conducted. Outcome measures included car
diovascular and noncardiovascular deaths, and adverse cardiovascular e
vents including new/worsened angina, myocardial infarction (MI), serio
us arrhythmia, stroke, congestive heart failure, and bleeding. Among a
ll amlodipine-treated patients (n = 32,920), the incidence rates for a
ll-cause death, MI, and new/worsened angina were 3.0, 3.3, and 1.6/1,0
00 patient-years of exposure, respectively. Among those in comparative
trials alone (n = 4,126), the all-cause death rate was 4.1/1,000 pati
ent-years, which was comparable to that of other non-CCB agents and si
gnificantly less than that of other CCBs (23.8/1,000 patient-years, p
= 0.015), although the difference in rates represents only 2 deaths. A
mong all nifedipine-GITS-treated patients (n = 2,645), the rate of all
-cause death was 4.1/1,000 patient-years, of MI 6.5/1,000 patient-year
s, and of new/ worsened angina 5.7/1,000 patient-years. The incidence
rates for MI and other cardiac events were low in these hypertension t
rials, and did not differ among treatment groups in either the amlodip
ine or nifedipine GITS comparative analyses. In the clinical trial dat
abases analyzed, there is no signal suggesting excessive risk of death
or cardiovascular events for hypertensive patients treated with amlod
ipine or nifedipine GITS. (C) 1998 by Excerpta Medica, Inc.