A. Nobili et al., A PRIVATE TOLL-FREE TELEPHONE MEDICAL INFORMATION-SERVICE - 5 YEARS OF ACTIVITY - OLD PROBLEMS AND NEW PERSPECTIVES, The Annals of pharmacotherapy, 32(1), 1998, pp. 120-125
INTRODUCTION: Healthcare professionals need to continually update thei
r knowledge to provide care based on scientific evidence. In some case
s it can be difficult to gain access to the different sources of medic
al information. In an attempt to overcome these problems, a toll-free
telephone medical information service (Doctorline) was established. OB
JECTIVE: TO describe the development, aims, organization, and activiti
es of this private service. METHODS: Doctorline is an independent, unb
iased, toll-free medical information service that provides information
on clinical, pharmacologic, and toxicologic issues; bibliographic sea
rches; full-text articles; public and private clinics; details of fort
hcoming congresses; and legislative documentation. The service is avai
lable Monday through Friday, 1000 to 2000. Staff members are physician
s trained in communication techniques, literature evaluation methodolo
gies, and computerized database use. The main on-line facilities are M
EDLINE, Micromedex-CCIS, and the Italian Formulary on CD-ROM. Books, b
ulletins, national and international drug formularies, and property fi
les (i.e., directory of Italian public and private clinics) are also a
vailable. RESULTS: In 5 years, Doctorline has received 65 258 calls. N
early 34% of the calls were made by general practitioners, followed by
cardiologists (22%), orthopedists (15%), pharmacists (14%), gastroent
erologists (13%), and urologists (10%). From 1991 to 1996, nearly 20%
of the calls concerned pharmacologic issues, 43% nonpharmacologic issu
es, while the rest of the calls were for nonclinical requests. Approxi
mately 21% of all questions received an answer during the same phone c
all (on-line answers); for the other answers (off-line answers) the me
an +/- SD waiting time was 7.8 +/- 10.4 days, Although the nature of t
he questions has been recorded since 1991, data about the exact number
of physicians who used the service are available only from 1994. Data
from 1994 indicate that of the 52 181 physicians who could access the
service, only 8817 (16.9%) called at least once, with a mean number o
f calls per physician of 3.9 (range 3.0-5.6), CONCLUSIONS: The future
of Doctorline mill depend on the quality and validity of the informati
on provided (i.e., based exclusively on scientific evidence, independe
nt of the source of funds), the promotion of the aims organization, an
d clinical utility of the service (especially among physicians who mad
e little or no use of the service), and differentiation of the service
activities in relation to the physician's specific needs.