HELICAL CT OF THE PANCREAS - A COMPARISON OF CINE DISPLAY AND FILM-BASED VIEWING

Citation
Vm. Bonaldi et al., HELICAL CT OF THE PANCREAS - A COMPARISON OF CINE DISPLAY AND FILM-BASED VIEWING, American journal of roentgenology, 170(2), 1998, pp. 373-376
Citations number
13
Categorie Soggetti
Radiology,Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
ISSN journal
0361803X
Volume
170
Issue
2
Year of publication
1998
Pages
373 - 376
Database
ISI
SICI code
0361-803X(1998)170:2<373:HCOTP->2.0.ZU;2-L
Abstract
OBJECTIVE. Radiologists must manage a tremendous number of helical CT images daily. Hence, the use of cine display review is increasing. Our aim was to compare cine display of helical CT examinations of the pan creas with conventional film-based viewing. SUBJECTS AND METHODS, Fort y-eight consecutive patients undergoing helical CT of the pancreas wer e prospectively included in the study. Five-millimeter-thick contrast- enhanced helical CT sections of the pancreas were reconstructed in l-m m increments for cine display review and in 5-mm-thick increments for film-based review, Two radiologists reviewed the two sets of data inde pendently. Review of the cine display images was followed by review of the film-based images 2 months later. For both the cine display and t he film-based images, reviewers used a four-point scale to grade vascu lar anatomy (splenic vein and artery, superior mesenteric vein and art ery, portal confluence, dorsal pancreatic artery, and gastroduodenal a rtery); ductal anatomy (common bile duct in its hilar, suprapancreatic , and intrapancreatic portions and pancreatic duct in its caudal, corp oreal, and cephalic portions); sharpness of the pancreatic and lesion contours; and overall image quality, RESULTS. The conspicuity of pancr eatic contours was graded better on cine display (p = .0035). All veno us and arterial landmarks were graded significantly better on cine dis play, Likewise, visibility of the common bile ducts and pancreatic duc ts was scored significantly better with cine display. In three patient s, cine display images revealed the pancreatic duct, and the film-base d images did not. Although 21 lesions were shown on both sets of image s, the lesions were better seen on cine display (p <.005), CONCLUSION, Vascular and ductal anatomy is better delineated on cine images gener ated from overlapped sections than on conventional film-based images. Lesions are also more sharply delineated on cine display images.