Ji. Spark et al., ALLOGENEIC VERSUS AUTOLOGOUS BLOOD DURING ABDOMINAL AORTIC-ANEURYSM SURGERY, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery, 14(6), 1997, pp. 482-486
Objectives: To determine if cell-salvaged autologous blood can serve a
s an alternative to homologous blood, and to examine the incidence of
infected complications and length of postoperative stay. Design: A pro
spective randomised study comprising autologous and homologous blood t
ranfusions in patients undergoing elective infrarenal abdominal aortic
surgery. Methods: Fifty patients undergoing AAA surgery were prospect
ively randomised to homologous blood (n=27), or autologous blood trans
fusion (n = 23), using a cell salvage autotransfusion device. Results:
The haemoglobin at the time of hospital discharge uas similar for bot
h groups (11.0 vs. 10.8 g/dl) with no difference in perioperative mort
ality. The length of stay teas reduced in those patients who received
autologous blood (9 days vs. 12 days, p<0.05 Mann-Whitney U test). The
re were four infected cases in Nle autologous group and 12 in the homo
logous group (p=n.s., Fisher's exact probability test). However, patie
nts mile received 3-4 units of homologous blood had an increased risk
of infection compared to those who received a similar amount of autolo
gous blood (50% vs. 0%). Conclusions: Cell salvage autologous blood ca
n safely replace, or at least decrease, exposure to homologous blood t
ransfusion, with a reduction in the mean hospital stay.