Gp. Saetre et al., PATERNAL CARE IN PIED FLYCATCHERS FICEDULA-HYPOLEUCA - ENERGY-EXPENDITURE IN RELATION TO PLUMAGE COLOR AND MATING STATUS, Ardea, 85(2), 1997, pp. 233-242
Females may benefit from expending more resources in care of offspring
sired by sexually attractive males than by those of unattractive male
s in species with biparental care. Attractive males may therefore redu
ce their share of parental expenditure to increase own survivorship an
d to further mating success. On the other hand, if direct benefits thr
ough male care are important for female mate choice, sexually attracti
ve males may be expected to have a higher parental expenditure than un
attractive males. We measured daily energy expenditure of attractive a
nd unattractive (i.e. brightly and dull coloured) male Pied Flycatcher
s Ficedula hypoleuca during a period of intensive parental care applyi
ng the doubly-labelled water technique. We did not find any consistent
differences in energy expenditure between bright and dull males, lend
ing little direct support to either hypotheses. Combined with previous
studies of the same species, we suggest that bright males are more ef
ficient in bringing food to the brood per unit of energy spent. Polyga
mously mated males divide their feeding effort among the primary and s
econdary brood(s), although most care is given to the primary brood. W
e found that bigamous males had higher daily energy expenditures than
monogamous males. This result suggests that polygamy is associated wit
h energetic costs to males, possibly related to the need of travel bet
ween nests but perhaps also to an overall higher parental investment.
We argue that costs to males should be incorporated in discussions on
the evolution of polygamy.