Md. Mckee et al., OUTCOME OF ULNAR NEUROLYSIS DURING POSTTRAUMATIC RECONSTRUCTION OF THE ELBOW, Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume, 80B(1), 1998, pp. 100-105
We performed ulnar nerve neurolysis and transposition during reconstru
ctive operations on 20 consecutive patients (21 elbows) with neuropath
y after the failure of primary treatment of elbow fractures. There wer
e 11 men and nine women with a mean age of 48.3 years. Preoperatively,
four elbows were in McGowan stage I, seven in stage II and ten in sta
ge III and the mean Gabel and Amadio ulnar nerve score was 3.2. At a m
ean follow-up of 32.1 months (24 to 67) eve performed comprehensive ne
urological, functional, electrophysiological and outcome assessments.
Patient satisfaction was high with good pain relief and restoration of
hand strength and dexterity. The mean Gabel and Amadio score had impr
oved to 6.5, an improvement of 3.3. There were one excellent, 16 good,
2 fair and 2 poor results; both of the last were due to failure of th
e underlying elbow reconstruction. Even for advanced stage-II and stag
e-III lesions we achieved good function, return of intrinsic power, an
d a high rate of patient satisfaction.