INVESTIGATION OF RATERS AND RATEES REACTIONS TO 3 METHODS OF PERFORMANCE-APPRAISAL - BOS, BARS, AND GRS

Citation
A. Tziner et al., INVESTIGATION OF RATERS AND RATEES REACTIONS TO 3 METHODS OF PERFORMANCE-APPRAISAL - BOS, BARS, AND GRS, Canadian journal of the Administrative Sciences Association of Canada, 14(4), 1997, pp. 396-404
Citations number
15
ISSN journal
08250383
Volume
14
Issue
4
Year of publication
1997
Pages
396 - 404
Database
ISI
SICI code
0825-0383(1997)14:4<396:IORARR>2.0.ZU;2-4
Abstract
It was hypothesized that in comparison to a GRS-based performance appr aisal and review, behaviour-based (BARS and BOS) appraisals and review s would generate superior goal properties (e.g., specificity), better goal characteristics (e.g., acceptance), and more favourable user reac tions (e.g., ratee satisfaction with the appraisal process). Data from a field experiment involving 46 police sergeants (raters) and their 1 52 subordinates (ratees) supported almost all of the predictions. Part icularly strong evidentiary support was found for the BOS-based perfor mance appraisal and review. These results, as well as recent empirical evidence from other studies, lend credence to the proposition that a BOS-based performance appraisal and review may be superior to other ap praisal methods in terms of yielding more favourable attitudinal effec ts.