M. Benfarhat et al., PERCUTANEOUS BALLOON VERSUS SURGICAL CLOSED AND OPEN MITRAL COMMISSUROTOMY - 7-YEAR FOLLOW-UP RESULTS OF A RANDOMIZED TRIAL, Circulation, 97(3), 1998, pp. 245-250
Citations number
52
Categorie Soggetti
Peripheal Vascular Diseas",Hematology,"Cardiac & Cardiovascular System
Background-Percutaneous balloon mitral commissurotomy (BMC) has been p
roposed as an alternative to surgical closed mitral commissurotomy (CM
C) and open mitral commissurotomy (OMC) for the management of rheumati
c mitral valve stenosis (MS). Methods and Results-We conducted a prosp
ective, randomized trial comparing the results of the 3 procedures in
90 patients (30 patients in each group) with severe pliable MS. Cardia
c catheterization was performed in all patients before and at 6 months
alter each procedure. All patients had clinical and echocardiographic
evaluation initially and throughout the 7-year follow-up period, Gorl
in mitral valve area (MVA) increased much more after BMC (from 0.9 +/-
0.16 to 2.2 +/- 0.4 cm(2)) and OMC (from 0.9 +/- 0.2 to 2.2 +/- 0.3 c
m(2)) than after CMC (from 0.9 +/- 0.2 to 1.6 +/- 0.1 cm(2)), Residual
MS (MVA < 1.5 cm(2)) was 0% after BMC or OMC and 27% after CMC. There
was no early or late mortality or thromboembolism among the three gro
ups. At 7-year follow-up, echocardiographic MVA was similar and greate
r after BMC and OMC (1.8 +/- 0.4 cm(2) than after CMC (1.3 +/- 0.3 cm(
2); P < .001). Restenosis (MVA < 1.5 cm(2)) rate was 6.6% after BMC or
OMC versus 37% after CMC. Residual atrial septal defect was present i
n 2 patients and severe grade 3 mitral regurgitation was present in 1
patient in the BMC group, Eighty-seven percent of patients after BMC a
nd 90% of patients after OMC were in New York Heart Association functi
onal class I versus 33% (P < .0001) after CMC. Freedom from reinterven
tion was 90% after BMC, 93% after OMC, and 50% after CMC, Conclusions-
In contrast to surgical CMC, BMC and QMC produce excellent and compara
ble early hemodynamic improvement and are associated with a lower rate
of residual stenosis and restenosis and need for reintervention. Howe
ver, the good results, lower cost, and elimination of drawbacks of tho
racotomy and cardiopulmonary bypass indicate that BMC should be the tr
eatment of choice for patients with tight pliable rheumatic MS.