S. Hermouet et al., ANALYSIS OF PLATELET RECOVERY AFTER AUTOLOGOUS TRANSPLANTATION WITH G-CSF MOBILIZED CD34+ CELLS PURIFIED FROM LEUKAPHERESIS PRODUCTS, HEM CELL TH, 39(6), 1997, pp. 317-325
We studied platelet recovery in relation to graft content in CFUs and
CD34+ cells in 31 patients with multiple myeloma (21) or non-Hodgkin l
ymphoma (10) receiving marrow-ablative therapy followed by autologous
transplantation with G-CSF mobilized CD34+ cells purified from leukaph
eresis products. Twelve patients had prolonged post-transplantation th
rombopenia (greater than or equal to 14 days): their graft contents in
CD34+ cells, CFU-GM and BFU-E were significantly inferior to those of
patients with rapid platelet recovery. Although numbers of infused CD
34+ cells and CFU-GM or BFU-E were well correlated, the graft content
in CD34+ cells was the only parameter predictive of platelet recovery
(r = -0.38, p = 0.04), with a threshold of 2.5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg.
However, because rapid platelet reconstitution was obtained for 4 of
16 patients re-infused with < 2.5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg, we investiga
ted whether the graft CFU-MK content might be a better predictor of pl
atelet reconstitution than the CD34+ cell content. Eighteen CD34 graft
s were studied for CFU-MK content: CD34 and CFU-MK contents were weakl
y correlated (r = 0.52, p = 0.03), but there was no correlation betwee
n numbers of infused CFU-MK and time to platelet recovery. We conclude
that, for autologous CD34 grafts, CFU-MK assays, like CFU-GM or BFU-E
assays, cannot be used to predict platelet recovery. A CD34+ cell con
tent greater than or equal to 2.5 x 10(6)/kg remains the only reliable
indicator of the platelet reconstitution capacity of a CD34 graft.