The article considers how the preservation of biodiversity is morally
justified in some of the key texts on environmental ethics, i.e. wheth
er or not biodiversity can be justified as a moral end in itself. The
views are classified according to the criteria which they hold to be t
he ultimate moral beneficiaries; positions are named as anthropocentri
sm, biocentrism and ecocentrism. In general, they are not in favor of
regarding biodiversity as intrinsically valuable, but think its moral
value as derivative. This means that the myriad characters of life on
Earth are to be maintained as diverse because of their instrumental va
lue for the constituents. It seems that Naess's deep ecology is the on
ly major position that argues for biodiversity's intrinsic value, but
this view has proved to be problematic.