Wm. Simpson et al., UPTAKE AND ACCEPTABILITY OF ANTENATAL HIV TESTING - RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL OF DIFFERENT METHODS OF OFFERING THE TEST, BMJ. British medical journal, 316(7127), 1998, pp. 262-267
Objective: To determine the uptake and acceptability Of different meth
ods of a universal offer of voluntary HIV testing to pregnant women. D
esign: Randomised controlled trial involving four combinations of writ
ten and verbal communication, followed by the direct offer of a test.
The control group receive no information and no direct offer of a test
, although testing was available on request. Setting: Hospital antenat
al clinic covering most of the population of the city of Edinburgh. Su
bjects: 3024 pregnant women booking at tile clinic over a 10 month per
iod. Main outcome measures: Uptake af HIV testing and women's knowledg
e, satisfaction and anxiety. Results: Uptake rates were 6% for those i
n the control group and 35% for those directly offered the test. Neith
er the style of leaflet nor the length of discussion had an effect on
uptake. Significant independent predictors of uptake were a direct tes
t offer; the midwife seen; and being unmarried, previous tested and yo
unger age. Knowledge of the specific benefits of testing increased wit
h the amount of information given, but neither satisfaction nor anxiet
y was affected by the type of offer. Conclusions: The universal offer
of HIV testing is not intrusive and is acceptable to pregnant women. A
policy of offering the HIV test to all women resulted in higher uptak
e and did not increase anxiety or dissatisfaction. Uptake depends more
on the midwife than the method of offering the test. Low uptake rates
and inadequate detection of HIV infection point to the need to assess
a more routine approach to testing.