A RANDOMIZED, PROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS OF 5 SPERM PREPARATION TECHNIQUES BEFORE INTRAUTERINE INSEMINATION OF HUSBAND SPERM

Citation
Dt. Carrell et al., A RANDOMIZED, PROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS OF 5 SPERM PREPARATION TECHNIQUES BEFORE INTRAUTERINE INSEMINATION OF HUSBAND SPERM, Fertility and sterility, 69(1), 1998, pp. 122-126
Citations number
25
Categorie Soggetti
Obsetric & Gynecology
Journal title
ISSN journal
00150282
Volume
69
Issue
1
Year of publication
1998
Pages
122 - 126
Database
ISI
SICI code
0015-0282(1998)69:1<122:ARPAO5>2.0.ZU;2-Y
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate pregnancy rates (PRs) in women undergoing artif icial insemination with sperm alternately prepared by one of five tech niques: sperm washing, Percoll gradient centrifugation, swim-up, swim- down, or refrigeration/heparin treatment. Design: Each treatment group alternated in a different order through the five sperm preparations. Pregnancy rates were compared for each sperm preparation. Setting: Two infertility centers, one located in an academic institution and the o ther a regional hospital. Patient(s): Three hundred sixty-three women undergoing 898 artificial inseminations with husband semen with a prog ressive motile sperm count of > 20 million sperm per mt were randomly placed in the five treatment groups. Main Outcome Measure(s): Pregnanc y rates. Result(s): The overall ongoing PR per insemination was 9.7% ( 87/898), including 6.12% for natural cycles (n = 196), 12.8% for clomi phene citrate-stimulated cycles (n = 101), and 10.3% for gonadotropin- stimulated cycles (n = 601). The highest ongoing PRs for sperm prepara tions followed the swim-up technique (13.2%, 26/197) and the Percoll g radient centrifugation technique (12.7%, 26/204).Conclusion(s): These data suggest that the swim-up and Percoll gradient preparations result in higher PRs than the wash, swim-down, and refrigeration/heparin tec hniques. ((C) 1998 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.).