Dt. Carrell et al., A RANDOMIZED, PROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS OF 5 SPERM PREPARATION TECHNIQUES BEFORE INTRAUTERINE INSEMINATION OF HUSBAND SPERM, Fertility and sterility, 69(1), 1998, pp. 122-126
Objective: To evaluate pregnancy rates (PRs) in women undergoing artif
icial insemination with sperm alternately prepared by one of five tech
niques: sperm washing, Percoll gradient centrifugation, swim-up, swim-
down, or refrigeration/heparin treatment. Design: Each treatment group
alternated in a different order through the five sperm preparations.
Pregnancy rates were compared for each sperm preparation. Setting: Two
infertility centers, one located in an academic institution and the o
ther a regional hospital. Patient(s): Three hundred sixty-three women
undergoing 898 artificial inseminations with husband semen with a prog
ressive motile sperm count of > 20 million sperm per mt were randomly
placed in the five treatment groups. Main Outcome Measure(s): Pregnanc
y rates. Result(s): The overall ongoing PR per insemination was 9.7% (
87/898), including 6.12% for natural cycles (n = 196), 12.8% for clomi
phene citrate-stimulated cycles (n = 101), and 10.3% for gonadotropin-
stimulated cycles (n = 601). The highest ongoing PRs for sperm prepara
tions followed the swim-up technique (13.2%, 26/197) and the Percoll g
radient centrifugation technique (12.7%, 26/204).Conclusion(s): These
data suggest that the swim-up and Percoll gradient preparations result
in higher PRs than the wash, swim-down, and refrigeration/heparin tec
hniques. ((C) 1998 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.).