IF ENDOPYELOTOMY WORKS, WHY NOT EXOPYELOTOMY

Citation
Dd. Gaur et al., IF ENDOPYELOTOMY WORKS, WHY NOT EXOPYELOTOMY, MINIMALLY INVASIVE THERAPY & ALLIED TECHNOLOGIES, 6(5-6), 1997, pp. 463-466
Citations number
19
Journal title
MINIMALLY INVASIVE THERAPY & ALLIED TECHNOLOGIES
ISSN journal
13645706 → ACNP
Volume
6
Issue
5-6
Year of publication
1997
Pages
463 - 466
Database
ISI
SICI code
1364-5706(1997)6:5-6<463:IEWWNE>2.0.ZU;2-T
Abstract
Endopyelotomy, performed by the percutaneous or the retrograde approac h, is a safe and effective minimally invasive modality for treatment o f patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction. However, due to a small but calculated risk of vascular and ureteral injury, the procedu re may not be suitable in a certain group of patients. 'Exopyelotomy', a new term coined for retroperitoneoscopic endopyelotomy, appears to be a logical minimally invasive alternative in such patients. Although , our experience is limited to only four patients, the encouraging res ults and the simplicity of the procedure are good enough reasons for i ts inclusion in the armamentarium of an endoscopic surgeon. As it does not transgress the peritoneal cavity, the ureter and, the renal paren chymal, theoretically, it appears to be reasonably safe.