This paper addresses the use of weight functions to model publication
bias in metaanalysis. Since publication bias is hard to gauge, a nonpa
rametric epsilon-contamination class of weight functions is introduced
. Sensitivity of conclusions to the specification of the weight functi
on is explored by examining the range of results for the entire E-cont
amination class. First, lower bounds are found on the coverage of conf
idence intervals. If little publication bias is suspected, results are
robust even when considered over the entire epsilon-contamination cla
ss. However, if more substantial publication bias is suspected, then t
he coverage provided by the usual interval estimator is not robust. In
this case, an alternative interval estimator is suggested. Secondly,
for the case in which prior information is available, upper and lower
bounds are found on posterior quantities of interest.