Objectives. To determine whether a puboprostatic ligament-sparing tech
nique of prostatic apical dissection provided improved urinary contine
nce after radical retropubic prostatectomy. Methods, A total of 43 men
with clinically localized prostate cancer underwent radical retropubi
c prostatectomy (standard apical dissection in 25, puboprostatic ligam
ent-sparing technique in 18). Patients were evaluated by independent o
bserver questionnaire to determine their continence status. The questi
onnaire was tested in a control group of 25 men who had not undergone
prostate surgery. The overall continence rate and time to achieve cont
inence was compared between the two surgical groups. In addition, the
clinical and pathologic stages and both the rate and location of posit
ive margins were assessed. Results. Mean patient age and serum prostat
e-specific antigen values were not significantly different: between th
e two groups. Clinical and pathologic stages were also similar. The me
an follow-up period for the puboprostatic ligament-sparing group was 3
5 weeks compared with 57 weeks for the standard group (P <0.05). The m
edian time until continence was achieved after surgery was significant
ly shorter (P = 0.01) for the puboprostatic ligament-sparing group tha
n for the standard method (6.5 and 12 weeks, respectively). However, t
he overall continence rate at 1-year follow-up for the two groups was
similar (100% and 94%, respectively). The positive margin rate and loc
ation of positive margins were not different with the puboprostatic li
gament-sparing technique. Conclusions. The puboprostatic ligament-spar
ing technique improves the rapidity of return of urinary continence af
ter radical prostatectomy without significantly enhancing overall cont
inence or interfering with the therapeutic efficacy of the procedure.
(C) 1998, Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.