Dg. Mackay et al., HMS LANGUAGE PRODUCTION DEFICITS - IMPLICATIONS FOR RELATIONS BETWEENMEMORY, SEMANTIC BINDING, AND THE HIPPOCAMPAL SYSTEM, Journal of memory and language, 38(1), 1998, pp. 28-69
To test the claim that H.M. exhibits a ''pure memory deficit'' that ha
s left his language production intact, we compared the language produc
tion of H.M. and controls in three studies. In Study 1. participants d
escribed the two meanings of visually presented sentences that they kn
ew were ambiguous, and H.M.'s descriptions suggested a semantic-level
production deficit: Relative to controls of comparable age, intelligen
ce, and education, H.M.'s descriptions were significantly less effecti
ve, less clear, less concise. and more repetitious at lexical, phrase.
and sentence levels of language production. In Study 2, naive judges
rated H.M.'s descriptions as less grammatical, less comprehensible, an
d less coherent than descriptions of controls. Study 3 replicated thes
e results for conversational speech about childhood events that occurr
ed ion before H.M.'s operation. his epilepsy, and his epilepsy treatme
nts. Present results contradict stages of processing theories that loc
alize H.M.'s deficit to a storage stage that is independent of process
es for retrieving and producing verbal materials, and instead support
a distributed-memory theory in which memory storage and retrieval invo
lving verbal materials are inherent aspects of normal language product
ion. (C) 1998 Academic Press.