Fa. Wichmann et Gb. Henning, NO ROLE FOR MOTION BLUR IN EITHER MOTION DETECTION OR MOTION-BASED IMAGE SEGMENTATION, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science,and vision., 15(2), 1998, pp. 297-306
The human contrast sensitivity function is bandpass in form for stimul
i of low temporal frequency but low pass for flickering or moving stim
uli. Because the loss in sensitivity to moving stimuli is large, image
s moving on the retina have little perceptible high-spatial-frequency
content. The loss of high-spatial-frequency content-often referred to
as motion blur-provides a potential cue to motion. The amount of motio
n blur is a function of stimulus velocity but is significant at veloci
ties encountered by the visual system in everyday situations. Our expe
riments determined the influence of high-spatial-frequency losses indu
ced by motion of this order on motion detection and on motion-based im
age segmentation. Motion detection and motion-based segmentation tasks
were performed with either spectrally low-pass or spectrally broadban
d stimuli. Performance on these tasks was compared with a condition ha
ving no motion but in which form differences mimicked the perceptual l
oss of high spatial frequencies produced by motion. This allowed the r
elative salience of motion and motion-induced blur to be determined. N
either image segmentation nor motion detection was sensitive to the hi
gh-spatial-frequency content of the stimuli. Thus the change in percep
tual form produced in moving stimuli is not normally used as a cue eit
her for motion detection or for motion-based image segmentation in ord
inary situations. (C) 1998 Optical Society of America.