PINACIDIL AND HYDROCHLOROTHIAZIDE ALONE OR IN COMBINATION IN THE TREATMENT OF HYPERTENSION IN THE ELDERLY

Citation
G. Abate et al., PINACIDIL AND HYDROCHLOROTHIAZIDE ALONE OR IN COMBINATION IN THE TREATMENT OF HYPERTENSION IN THE ELDERLY, Current therapeutic research, 59(1), 1998, pp. 62-71
Citations number
15
Categorie Soggetti
Pharmacology & Pharmacy","Medicine, Research & Experimental
ISSN journal
0011393X
Volume
59
Issue
1
Year of publication
1998
Pages
62 - 71
Database
ISI
SICI code
0011-393X(1998)59:1<62:PAHAOI>2.0.ZU;2-F
Abstract
Pinacidil (PIN) is a new antihypertensive cyanoguanidine derivative co mpound classified as a potassium channel opener, This double-masked, r andomized, controlled clinical study compared the antihypertensive eff icacy of PIN 25 mg alone, hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 12.5 mg alone, an d PIN 12.5 mg + HCTZ 12.5 mg, all given once a day, Eighty-four elderl y outpatients (39 men, 45 women; mean age, 77.5 +/- 5.5 years) with mi ld or moderate hypertension (diastolic blood pressure between 95 and 1 15 mm Hg) mere randomly assigned to one of the three treatment groups, After a 3-week placebo run-in period, patients received the active dr ug at 8 AM daily for 8 weeks, Office blood pressure (BP) measurements were performed at baseline and at 1, 2, 4, and 8 weeks, Ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) was performed for 24 hours (from 7 AM to 7 AM of the next day) at baseline and at the end of the treatment period, At the end of 8 weeks, 62 patients (73.8%) had normal BP (20 patients [71.4%] treated with PIN, 19 patients [67.9%] treated with HCTZ, and 23 patie nts [82.1%] treated with PIN + HCTZ). The classification of the patien ts as responders or nonresponders showed that all three treatments wer e effective, with a Slight advantage for the combination therapy (26 r esponders [92.8%]) over HCTZ alone (24 responders [85.7%]) and PIN alo ne (22 responders [78.6%]). However, differences between the groups me re not significant, Ambulatory BPs were significantly reduced in all g roups, Patients receiving HCTZ alone and PIN + HCTZ achieved good BP c ontrol that was persistent. over the 24 hours, whereas patients receiv ing PIN alone failed to achieve a significant reduction in nighttime B P, Heart rate was reduced in patients in the HCTZ and PIN + HCTZ Group s (7.2% and 5.7%, respectively), whereas it was only slightly changed in patients in the PIN group (1.4%). All drug regimens were well toler ated; only 11 patients complained of mild or moderate side effects, an d no patient discontinued treatment. In conclusion, combination therap y with PIN 12.5 mg + HCTZ 12.5 mg, given once a day, appears to provid e effective and well-tolerated 24-hour BP control in elderly hypertens ive patients.