STABILITY OF THE C-TERMINAL ALPHA-HELICAL DOMAIN OF BACTERIORHODOPSINTHAT PROTRUDES FROM THE MEMBRANE-SURFACE, AS STUDIED BY HIGH-RESOLUTION SOLID-STATE C-13 NMR
S. Yamaguchi et al., STABILITY OF THE C-TERMINAL ALPHA-HELICAL DOMAIN OF BACTERIORHODOPSINTHAT PROTRUDES FROM THE MEMBRANE-SURFACE, AS STUDIED BY HIGH-RESOLUTION SOLID-STATE C-13 NMR, Journal of Biochemistry, 123(1), 1998, pp. 78-86
We have recorded C-13 NMR spectra of [1-C-13]Ala-and [3-C-13] Ala-bact
eriorhodopsin (bR), [1-C-13]Ala-and [3-C-13]Ala-papain-cleaved bR, and
[3-C-13]Ala-labeled R227Q bR mutant by cross polarization-magic angle
spinning (CP-MAS) and dipolar decoupled-magic angle spinning (DD-MAS)
methods, The pH and temperature were varied, and Arg 227 was replaced
with Gin (R227Q), in order to clarify their effects on the stability
of the alpha-helical domain of the C-terminus that protrudes fi om the
membrane surface, The comparative C-13 CP- and DD-MAS NMR study of [3
-C-13]Ala-bR, rather than [1-C-13]Ala-bR, turned out to be the best me
ans to distinguish the C-13 NMR signals of the C-terminus from those o
f the rest of the transmembrane helices or loops, The inner segment of
the C-terminus, from Ala 228 to Ala 235, forms an alpha-helical domai
n (resonated at 15.9 ppm) either at neutral pH and/or at 10 to -10 deg
rees C. The alpha-helical peak was not seen, however, after either cle
avage of the C-terminus with papain or lowering the pH to 4.25, This a
lpha-helical structure, and a part of the random coil which was produc
ed from the helix at pH 4.25, were further converted to a low-temperat
ure-type alpha-helix, as indicated by an upfield displacement of the C
-13 NMR signal, when the temperature was lowered to 10-10;C. Surprisin
gly, the corresponding helical structure in R227Q is more stable than
in the wild type at the acidic pH, This alpha-helical peak was classif
ied as an alpha(II)-helix from the C-13 chemical shifts of C beta carb
on, although it was ascribed to an alpha(I)-helix on the basis of the
carbonyl shifts, This is in contrast to Ala 53 which adopts the alpha(
II)-helix as judged from the C-13 chemical shifts of C beta and the ca
rbonyl carbons, Therefore, this discrepancy might be caused by differe
ntial sensitivity of the two types of carbon signals to conformation a
nd to modes of hydrogen bonding when motional fluctuation is involved,
It is likely that the alpha(II)-helix form present at the C-terminus
is not always the type originally proposed but should be considered as
a form undergoing large-amplitude conformational fluctuation around a
lpha-helix.