MEETING REVIEW - THE 2ND MEETING ON THE CRITICAL-ASSESSMENT OF TECHNIQUES FOR PROTEIN-STRUCTURE PREDICTION (CASP2), ASILOMAR, CALIFORNIA, DECEMBER 13-16, 1996
Rl. Dunbrack et al., MEETING REVIEW - THE 2ND MEETING ON THE CRITICAL-ASSESSMENT OF TECHNIQUES FOR PROTEIN-STRUCTURE PREDICTION (CASP2), ASILOMAR, CALIFORNIA, DECEMBER 13-16, 1996, Folding & design, 2(2), 1997, pp. 27-42
In most fields of scientific endeavor, the outcomes of important exper
iments are not always known before the experiments are performed. But
in protein structure prediction, algorithms are usually developed and
tested in situations where the answers are known. In December 1996, th
e Second Meeting on the Critical Assessment of Techniques for Protein
Structure Prediction (CASP2) was held in Asilomar, California to recti
fy this situation: protein sequences were provided in advance for whic
h the experimental structure had not yet been published. Over 70 resea
rch groups provided bona fide predictions on 42 targets in four catego
ries: comparative or 'homology' modeling, fold recognition or 'threadi
ng', ab initio structure predictions, and docking predictions. Since t
he previous GASP meeting in 1994, the role of fold recognition in stru
cture prediction has increased enormously with the largest number of g
roups participating in this category. In this review, we highlight som
e of the important developments and give at least a qualitative sense
of what kind of methods produced some of the better predictions.