A number of important experimental data do not support the widespread
hypothesis that Na+-channels block is cerebroprotective, essentially b
ecause it reduces presynaptic glutamate release: (i) the inhibition of
exocytosis by these compounds is not specific to glutamate; (ii) aspa
rtate efflux produced by various stimuli was also reduced, but asparta
te cannot be released by exocytosis because it is not concentrated wit
hin presynaptic vesicles; and (iii) glutamate accumulated extracellula
rly during ischaemic or traumatic insult to the CNS is mainly of cytos
olic origin. As an alternative, we propose that use-dependent Na+-chan
nel blockers enhance the resistance of nerve cells to insults, primari
ly by decreasing their energy demand, and that reduced efflux of gluta
mate and other compounds is a consequence of attenuated cellular stres
s.