Objective: The Da Capo(TM) home flowmeter was tested versus the Urodyn
1000(TM) flowmeter. The two flowmeters are based on different princip
les. The Da Capo is a portable, battery powered flowmeter designed to
record all voidings during a period of time (e.g. 24 h) for a single p
atient. Methods: The flowmeters were tested with regard to accuracy of
measurement of the voided volume and maximum flow (Q(max),,,). Furthe
r, the Da Capo was tested by 10 healthy male volunteers, median age 47
years, range 21-57. Results: Both flowmeters were very accurate measu
ring Q(max),,, and voided volume. A few artifacts arose, i.e. extremel
y high Q(max),,, values were recorded. All test persons found the flow
meter easy to handle. Conclusion: The weight transducer based Da Capo
home flowmeter proved as accurate as the stationary flowmeters. It is
easy to handle and it provides all-day monitoring of uroflow and voide
d volume.