Forty college students were taught facilitated communication via a com
mercially available training videotape. They were then asked to facili
tate the communication of a confederate, who was described as developm
entally disabled and unable to speak. All 40 participants produced res
ponses that they attributed at least partially to the confederate, and
most attributed all of the communication entirely to her Eighty-nine
percent produced responses corresponding to information they had recei
ved, most of which was unknown to the confederate. Responding was sign
ificantly correlated with simple ideomotor responses with a pendulum a
nd was not affected by information about the controversy surrounding f
acilitated communication. These data support the hypothesis that facil
itated communication is an instance of automatic writing, akin to that
observed in hypnosis and with Ouija boards, and that the ability to p
roduce automatic writing is more common than previously thought.