Mla. Heijnen et al., LIMITED EFFECT OF CONSUMPTION OF UNCOOKED (RS2) OR RETROGRADED (RS3) RESISTANT STARCH ON PUTATIVE RISK-FACTORS FOR COLON-CANCER IN HEALTHY-MEN, The American journal of clinical nutrition, 67(2), 1998, pp. 322-331
To investigate whether resistant starch (RS) affects putative risk fac
tors for colon cancer, 24 healthy men consumed a daily RS supplement f
or 4 wk in addition to their habitual diet in a single-blind, randomiz
ed, balanced multiple crossover trial. During the first week, all subj
ects consumed the control supplement containing glucose. Subsequently,
each subject consumed, in random order, a supplement with RS, (uncook
ed high-amylose cornstarch), RS3, (extruded and retrograded high-amylo
se cornstarch), and glucose, each for 1 wk. The RS2 and RS3 supplement
s provided 32 g RS/d. Lithium was added to the supplements to measure
compliance. Feces, 24-h urine, and breath samples, as well as a 24-h f
ood-consumption recall were obtained weekly from each subject. Complia
nce as measured by urinary lithium recovery was satisfactory. The mean
composition of the background diet did not differ between the various
supplementation periods. Breath-hydrogen excretion, stool weight, and
fecal starch excretion were significantly higher during RS than durin
g glucose supplementation, but did not differ during RS, and RS, suppl
ementation. There were no significant differences in fecal dry weight,
pH, or short-chain fatty acid concentrations, nor in the pH, bile aci
d concentrations, cytotoxicity, or osmolality of fecal water. It is co
ncluded that in healthy men, supplementing the habitual diet for 1 wk
with 32 g RS2 or RS3/d compared with glucose had no effect on putative
risk factors for colon cancer, except for increasing stool weight and
colonic fermentative activity. There were no significant differences
between the effects of RS2 and RS, on the indexes studied.