Cc. Tudge, PHYLOGENY OF THE ANOMURA (DECAPODA, CRUSTACEA) - SPERMATOZOA AND SPERMATOPHORE MORPHOLOGICAL EVIDENCE, Bijdragen tot de dierkunde, 67(2), 1997, pp. 125-141
A phylogenetic analysis of selected anomuran, thalassinidean, and othe
r decapod crustacean taxa, based on spermatozoal ultrastructural chara
cters and spermatophore morphological characters, was performed and th
e following relationships of the taxa are elucidated from the trees pr
oduced. The Anomura are not a monophyletic assemblage, with the lomoid
Lomis being exclusive of the remainder of the anomuran taxa, and the
thalassinid Thalassina included in the anomuran clade. The synapomorph
y joining the majority of the conventional anomuran taxa (Lomis exclud
ed) is the cytoplasmic origin of the microtubular arms. When the palin
urid and thalassinoid representatives are separately designated as out
groups, the Astacidea and Brachyura jointly formed a sister group to t
he Anomura. The superfamilies Thalassinoidea, Paguroidea, and Galatheo
idea are not monophyletic groups. In all analyses the anomuran familie
s Coenobitidae and Porcellanidae each form a monophyletic group. The p
aguroid family Diogenidae is paraphyletic, with the genera Clibanarius
and Cancellus separate from a single clade containing the remaining d
iogenid genera. The families Paguridae and Parapaguridae form a monoph
yletic clade with the exception of Porcellanopagurus. The two represen
tatives of the family Chirostylidae (Eumunida and Uroptychus) fail to
associate with the other species in the Galatheoidea. The taxa in the
family Galatheidae are not a monophyletic assemblage. The only investi
gated hippoid Hippa is portrayed as the sister group to the remainder
of the anomuran taxa (with the exception of Lomis).