MANAGEMENT OF PATIENTS WITH ANGINA-PECTORIS BY GPS - A STUDY WITH STANDARDIZED (SIMULATED) PATIENTS IN ACTUAL PRACTICE

Background. Little is known about the management of patients with angi na pectoris by GPs. Objective. The purpose of this study was to assess how a group of GPs managed a patient with angina pectoris complaints in a real-life practice setting during unbiased consultations with sta ndardized patients. Methods. GPs were consulted during normal surgery hours by a standardized patient portraying a patient with angina pecto ris. The setting was Trondheim, Norway. All 87 GPs in the city of Tron dheim (Norway) were informed by letter about a study with standardized patients and invited to take part. They were asked to give consent to be visited during actual surgery hours by standardized patients. The date, number and content of the visits planned were not mentioned. The y were not told that the study focused on angina pectoris. For budgeta ry reasons it was decided to ask 24 physicians to participate. The GPs were consulted during normal surgery hours by a standardized patient portraying a patient with angina pectoris. The patients reported on th e consultations using a checklist based on guidelines for management o f angina pectoris. Outcome measures were the content and number of act ions undertaken from the guidelines. Results. Twenty-eight GPs (32%) a greed to participate. Of these, 24 were selected and visited. One doct or detected the standardized patient. The results showed that the part icipating physicians met 76% of the guidelines used. However, the GPs ordered 31 different types of laboratory test (mean = 7.9, range = 1-1 8 per physician). In addition, the 23 consultations resulted in seven referrals (two for chest X-rays, four for an exercise test and one ref erral to a specialist in cardiology). Twenty-two of the 23 doctors mad e the correct diagnosis and informed the patient accordingly. Conclusi on. When assessed in an unbiased situation in real practice, GPs perfo rmed well against a pre-set standard for management of angina pectoris patients. Much variation was found in the request for laboratory test s. These real-life practice data suggest that there is a need for disc ussing guidelines for effective ordering of laboratory tests in genera l practice.