PREDICTIVE VALUE OF THE FLOW CYTOMETRIC PCNA ASSAY (PROLIFERATING CELL NUCLEAR ANTIGEN) IN HEAD AND NECK TUMORS AFTER ACCELERATED-HYPERFRACTIONATED RADIOCHEMOTHERAPY
F. Wenz et al., PREDICTIVE VALUE OF THE FLOW CYTOMETRIC PCNA ASSAY (PROLIFERATING CELL NUCLEAR ANTIGEN) IN HEAD AND NECK TUMORS AFTER ACCELERATED-HYPERFRACTIONATED RADIOCHEMOTHERAPY, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 37(4), 1997, pp. 771-776
Citations number
22
Categorie Soggetti
Oncology,"Radiology,Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
Purpose: Proliferation of tumor cells during radiotherapy may limit tu
mor control, especially in rapidly proliferating tumors such as head a
nd neck carcinomas. We present a flow cytometric method for detection
of PCNA in solid head and neck tumors and how these data correlate wit
h outcome. Methods and Materials: Pretherapeutic biopsies of 20 inoper
able patients with Stage IV squamous cell carcinoma were examined. Bip
arametric flow cytometry was done after anti-PCNA (PC10) and propidium
iodine staining were performed. PCNA index (percentage PCNA positive
cells), DNA index, and S phase fraction (SPF, euploid tumors only) wer
e determined. The therapy consisted of an accelerated-hyperfractionate
d radiochemotherapy (66 Gy/5 weeks, concomitant boost of 1.6Gy/day in
weeks 4 + 5, Carboplatin 5 x 70 mg/m(2) in weeks 1;5). The median foll
ow-up time was 30 months. Results: Fourteen patients suffered from dis
ease progession and 12 died. Median actuarial, cause-specific survival
, and disease-free survival (DFS) times were 17 and 9 months, respecti
vely. PCNA indices ranged from 4 to 70% (median 9%); there were 7 aneu
ploid and 13 euploid tumors. SPF ranged from 4 to 14.5% (median 10.5%)
. Neither SPF nor ploidy had a significant influence on outcome. Patie
nts were divided according to PCNA index in higher (n = 10) and lower
(it = 10) than the median. Survival and DFS were 13 and 6 months for t
he group >9% and 20 and 15 months for the group <9%. The difference in
DFS was significant (p = 0.03, log rank test). Conclusion: These resu
lts fall in line with other studies showing the influence of pretherap
eutic proliferation on outcome after radiotherapy. Although the modera
tely accelerated therapy regimen certainly reduces the influence of pr
oliferation on outcome, patients with faster proliferating tumors stil
l have a worse outcome. DFS is the more relevant endpoint in this stud
y because of effective salvage therapies, which influence survival. (C
) 1997 Elsevier Science Inc.