Purpose. To evaluate conventional radiography, US and CT in identifyin
g jejuno-ileal perforation. Material and Methods: We retrospectively r
eviewed the findings of conventional radiography, US and CT in 13 cons
ecutive patients with surgically proven jejuno-ileal perforation. Resu
lts: The site of perforation was the ileum in 10 cases and the jejunum
in 3 cases. Free gas was identified in 6 cases (46%) while indirect f
indings of perforation were found in 7 (54%). The jejunal perforations
were diagnosed by indirect findings in all 3 cases. The ileal perfora
tions were diagnosed by direct findings in 6 cases and indirect findin
gs in 4 cases. Conclusion: Conventional radiology did not detect free
gas in 7 (54%) of the 13 patients examined. In the absence of free gas
, radiology showed indirect signs in all 7 patients, the most common b
eing intraperitoneal free fluid in 5 (71%) of them. Jejunal perforatio
ns were more rare than ileal perforations and more difficult to identi
fy by radiology. US was not useful for detecting free gas but it was u
seful for identifying intraperitoneal free fluid and intestinal paresi
s. Abdominal CT was useful when performed 6 h after the symptoms began
.