The past several years have seen systematic attempts to assess the ext
ent to which analytic approaches from anthropology and, to a lesser de
gree, from other social sciences, can provide insights into demographi
c behavior. These five commentaries, introduced by Carla Makhlouf Ober
meyer, examine the potentials and limitations of qualitative methods f
or improving our understanding of population processes. Susan Greenhal
gh argues that demography tends to be supportive of the existing insti
tutions of society and their political and policy goals. An infusion o
f qualitative methods into demography would be a correction for this b
ias. Tom Fricke contends that the characteristics of a demographically
viable theory of culture derive from its emphasis on understanding hi
ghly concrete and local situations. Another way of integrating demogra
phy and anthropology, writes Vijayendra Rao, is for ethnographic analy
sis to inform rational choice models, which generate hypotheses that a
re then analyzed with survey data using demographic methods. David Ker
tzer notes that demographic change can be understood only in terms of
a web of relationships involving cultural norms, social structure, pol
itical power, and economic relations. Finally, John Knodel argues that
focus groups and in-depth interviews make collection of qualitative d
ata more practical for demographers, permit data to be collected in se
veral communities in the same study, and facilitate comparative analys
is of findings between different settings.