IN-VIVO COMPARISON OF THE BIOCOMPATIBILITY OF 2 ROOT-CANAL SEALERS IMPLANTED INTO THE SUBCUTANEOUS CONNECTIVE-TISSUE OF RATS

Citation
I. Kolokouris et al., IN-VIVO COMPARISON OF THE BIOCOMPATIBILITY OF 2 ROOT-CANAL SEALERS IMPLANTED INTO THE SUBCUTANEOUS CONNECTIVE-TISSUE OF RATS, Journal of endodontics, 24(2), 1998, pp. 82-85
Citations number
16
Categorie Soggetti
Dentistry,Oral Surgery & Medicine
Journal title
ISSN journal
00992399
Volume
24
Issue
2
Year of publication
1998
Pages
82 - 85
Database
ISI
SICI code
0099-2399(1998)24:2<82:ICOTBO>2.0.ZU;2-9
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the in vivo biocompatibility of Apexit (a calcium hydroxide) and Pulp Canal Sealer (a classic zinc -oxide-eugenol), root canal sealers, after implantation in rat connect ive tissue. Forty-four white female Wistar-Furth rats were used. Each sealer was placed in Teflon tubes and implanted into specific dorsal s ubdermal tissues sites. Implants were removed after 5, 15, 60, and 120 days; fixed; and histologically prepared for microscopical evaluation . Severe inflammatory reactions with differing extensions of necrosis were observed with Apexit on the 5th and 15th days. The intensity of t he reaction had diminished by the 60th day, and this reduction continu ed progressively through the 120th day. It was characterized by the pr esence of connective tissue with a few macrophages. Moderate to severe inflammation with confined areas of necrosis was observed in the Pulp Canal Sealer specimens on the 5th day. The intensity of the reaction diminished by the 15th, 60th, and 120th days, but remained slightly gr eater than Apexit through longterm observation periods.