COMPARABLE SAFETY AND ANTIEMETIC EFFICACY OF A BRIEF (30-SECOND BOLUS) INTRAVENOUS GRANISETRON INFUSION AND A STANDARD (15-MINUTE) INTRAVENOUS ONDANSETRON INFUSION IN BREAST-CANCER PATIENTS RECEIVING MODERATELY EMETOGENIC CHEMOTHERAPY
Ea. Perez et al., COMPARABLE SAFETY AND ANTIEMETIC EFFICACY OF A BRIEF (30-SECOND BOLUS) INTRAVENOUS GRANISETRON INFUSION AND A STANDARD (15-MINUTE) INTRAVENOUS ONDANSETRON INFUSION IN BREAST-CANCER PATIENTS RECEIVING MODERATELY EMETOGENIC CHEMOTHERAPY, The cancer journal from Scientific American, 4(1), 1998, pp. 52-58
PURPOSE For patients receiving chemotherapy optimization of antiemetic
therapy in terms of safety of administration, efficacy, cost, and con
venience remains a subject of intense clinical research. In this study
, we evaluated and compared tile safety and antiemetic efficacy of a s
ingle 30-second intravenous bolus infusion of granisetron with those o
f a standard 15-minute intravenous infusion of ondansetron in chemothe
rapy-naive breast cancer patients receiving moderately emetogenic chem
otherapy. PATIENTS AND MATERIALS This was a randomized, double-blind,
double-dummy, multicenter crossover study of 623 chemotherapy-naive pa
tients (two male, 621 female) receiving moderately emetogenic chemothe
rapy (cyclophosphamide plus doxorubicin, with or without 5-fluorouraci
l) for breast cancer, Patients were assigned randomly to receive eithe
r granisetron or ondansetron in cycle 1 and the other agent in cycle 2
. Granisetron (10 mu g/kg) was administered as a 30-second intravenous
bolus infusion within 5 minutes before the start of chemotherapy and
ondansetron (32 mg) was administered as a 15-minute intravenous infusi
on beginning 30 minutes before the starr of chemotherapy. A total of 5
73 patients received the two planned chemotherapy cycles. Safety asses
sment nas based on the type and frequency of adverse experiences repor
ted by the patient at 24 and 48 hours after chemotherapy began, Effica
cy assessments included the occurrence of nausea or emesis and the pro
portion of patients who achieved total emetic control at 24 and 48 hou
rs after chemotherapy. RESULTS Similar proportions of patients in both
treatment groups remained free of emesis at the 24-hour assessment pe
riod (58.6% and 62.7% of granisetron- and ondansetron-treated patients
, respectively) and at 48 hours (42.2% and 45.0% for granisetron vs on
dansetron) in both cycles, The proportions of granisetron- and ondanse
tron-treated patients who remained nausea-free for the first 24 hours
after treatment in both cycles were 44.0% and 48.5%, respectively, and
at 48 hours were 26.7% and 32.0%, respectively, Statistical analysis
demonstrated no significant treatment-by-cycle interaction. The 30-sec
ond granisetron infusion and the 15-minute ondansetron infusion were w
ell tolerated. However, administration of ondansetron as a 15-minute i
ntravenous infusion produced abnormal vision (6.28%) in significantly
more patients than granisetron (0.35%), DISCUSSION These two intraveno
us 5-hydroxytryptamine(3)-receptor antagonist antiemetics were similar
ly effective in controlling acute nausea and emesis during two cycles
of moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. Granisetron (30 seconds) and th
e longer infusion of ondansetron (15 minutes) were well tolerated; how
ever, ondansetron was associated with a greater proportion of patients
reporting abnormal vision Granisetron administered as a 30-second bol
us infusion allows a considerably shorter waiting time between the end
of the antiemetic infusion and the initiation of chemotherapy, This s
horter administration time may enhance patient convenience and provide
r efficiency.