Dj. Cordato et al., PHARMACOKINETICS OF THIOPENTONE ENANTIOMERS FOLLOWING INTRAVENOUS-INJECTION OR PROLONGED INFUSION OF RAC-THIOPENTONE, British journal of clinical pharmacology, 43(4), 1997, pp. 355-362
Aims Thiopentone is administered as a racemate (rac-thiopentone) for i
nduction of anaesthesia as well as for neurological and neurosurgical
emergencies. The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of vac-thiopent
one have been extensively studied but the component R-(+)- and S-(-)-
enantiomers, until very recently, have been largely ignored. Methods T
he present study analyses the pharmacokinetics of R-(+)- and S-(-)-thi
opentone in 12 patients given rac-thiopentone intravenously for induct
ion of anaesthesia and five patients given a prolonged infusion of vdc
-thiopentone used for treatment of intracranial hypertension. Results
The mean total body clearance (CLT) and apparent volume of distributio
n at steady-state (V-ss) showed trends towards higher values for R-(+)
- than for S-(-)-thiopentone in both patient groups; CLT and V-ss of u
nbound fractions of R-(+)- and S-(-)-thiopentone, however, did not sho
w these trends. The time courses of R-(+)- and S-(-)- thiopentone seru
m concentrations were so similar that EEG effect could not be attribut
ed to one or other enantiomer. Serum protein binding for S-(-)-thiopen
tone was greater than for R-(+)-thiopentone (P=0.02) and 24 h urinary
excretion of R-(+)-thiopentone was greater than for S-(-)-thiopentone
(P=0.03). In one patient, concomitant measurement of CSF and serum thi
opentone concentrations found that serum: CSF equilibration of unbound
fractions of both enantiomers was essentially complete. Conclusions T
he study was unable to determine any pharmacokinetic difference of cli
nical significance between the R-(+)- and S-(-)-thiopentone enantiomer
s and concludes that minor differences in CLT and V-ss could be explai
ned by enantioselective difference found in serum protein binding.