ETIOLOGY OF HERNIATION OF THE HINDBRAIN IN CRANIOSYNOSTOSIS - AN INVESTIGATION INCORPORATING INTRACRANIAL-PRESSURE MONITORING AND MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING

Citation
Dnp. Thompson et al., ETIOLOGY OF HERNIATION OF THE HINDBRAIN IN CRANIOSYNOSTOSIS - AN INVESTIGATION INCORPORATING INTRACRANIAL-PRESSURE MONITORING AND MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING, Pediatric neurosurgery, 26(6), 1997, pp. 288-295
Citations number
35
Journal title
ISSN journal
10162291
Volume
26
Issue
6
Year of publication
1997
Pages
288 - 295
Database
ISI
SICI code
1016-2291(1997)26:6<288:EOHOTH>2.0.ZU;2-E
Abstract
The occurrence and extent of herniation of the hindbrain has been eval uated in a population of children with craniosynostosis by means of ma gnetic resonance imaging of the craniocervical junction. The role of i ntracranial pressure (ICP), posterior fossa size and hydrocephalus in the development of this deformity has also been assessed. Magnetic res onance imaging (Siemens Magnetom 1.5T) was reviewed in 27 cases of cra niosynostosis in whom there had been no previous cranial vault surgery . The position of the cerebellar tonsils in relation to the plane of t he foramen magnum was measured and an index of the size of the posteri or fossa relative to the rest of the cranial vault was also calculated for each case. The presence of hydrocephalus (requiring a cerebrospin al fluid diversion procedure) was documented. In 22 of these cases ove rnight, subdural ICP monitoring using the Camino fibre optic device ha d also been performed. Herniation of the hindbrain below the plane of the foramen magnum occurred in 10 of 27 cases (37%). The level of ICP showed a significant correlation with the extent of hindbrain herniati on (p < 0.001) as did small posterior fossa size (p = 0.0035). Hydroce phalus was present in 4 patients, all of whom had hindbrain herniation . The extent of hindbrain herniation did not correlate with age (p = 0 .48). We propose that herniation of the hindbrain in craniosynostosis is a consequence of brain deformation occurring in response to the phy sical forces imposed by a combination of the anatomical deformity at t he skull base and intracranial hypertension rather than a primary malf ormation of brain development as commonly supposed.