Va. Eagling et al., DIFFERENTIAL SELECTIVITY OF CYTOCHROME-P450 INHIBITORS AGAINST PROBE SUBSTRATES IN HUMAN AND RAT-LIVER MICROSOMES, British journal of clinical pharmacology, 45(2), 1998, pp. 107-114
Aims Chemical inhibitors of cytochrome P450 (CYP) are a useful tool in
defining the role of individual CYPs involved in drug metabolism. The
aim of the present study was to evaluate the selectivity and rank the
order of potency of a range of isoform-selective CYP inhibitors and t
o compare directly the effects of these inhibitors in human and rat he
patic microsomes. Methods Four chemical inhibitors of human cytochrome
P450 isoforms, furafylline (CYP1A2), sulphaphenazole (CYP2C9), diethy
ldithiocarbamate (CYP2E1), and ketoconazole (CYP3A4) were screened for
their inhibitory specificity towards CYP-mediated reactions in both h
uman and rat liver microsomal preparations. Phenacetin O-deethylation,
tolbutamide 4-hydroxylation, chlorzoxazone 6-hydroxylation and testos
terone 6 beta-hydroxylation were monitored for enzyme activity. Result
s Furafylline was a potent, selective inhibitor of phenacetin O-deethy
lation (CYP1A2-mediated) in human liver microsomes (IC50=0.48 mu M), b
ut inhibited both phenacetin O-deethylation and tolbutamide 4-hydroxyl
ation (CYP2C9-mediated) at equimolar concentrations in rat liver micro
somes (IC50=20.8 and 24.0 mu M respectively). Sulphaphenazole demonstr
ated selective inhibition of tolbutamide hydroxylation in human liver
microsomes but failed to inhibit this reaction in rat liver microsomes
. DDC demonstrated a low level of selectivity as an inhibitory probe f
or chlorzoxazone 6-hydroxylation (CYP2E1-mediated). DDC also inhibited
testosterone 6 beta-hydroxylation (CYP3A-mediated) in man and rat, an
d tolbutamide 4-hydroxylase activity in rat. Ketoconazole was a very p
otent, selective inhibitor of CYP3A4 activity in human liver (IC50=0.0
4 mu M). Although inhibiting CYP3A in rat liver it also inhibited all
other reactions at concentrations less than or equal to 5 mu M. Conclu
sions It is evident that CYP inhibitors do not exhibit the same select
ivity in human and rat liver microsomes. This is due to differential s
electivity of the inhibitors and/or differences in the CYP isoform res
ponsible for metabolism in the different species.