B. Hutchison et al., PROVISION OF PREVENTIVE CARE TO UNANNOUNCED STANDARDIZED PATIENTS, CMAJ. Canadian Medical Association journal, 158(2), 1998, pp. 185-193
Objective: To examine the relation between physician, training and pra
ctice characteristics and the provision of preventive care as describe
d in the guidelines of the Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health
Examination. Design: Cross-sectional study. Setting: Family practices
open to new patients within 1 hour's drive of Hamilton, Ont. Participa
nts: A total of 125 family physicians were randomly selected from resp
ondents to an earlier preventive care survey. Of the 125, 44 (35.2%) d
eclined to participate, and an additional 19 (15.2%) initially consent
ed but later withdrew when they closed their practices to new patients
. Sixty-two physicians thus participated in the study. Intervention: U
nannounced standardized patients posing as new patients to the practic
e visited study physicians' practices between September 1994 and Augus
t 1995, portraying 4 scenarios: 48-year-old man, 70-year-old man, 28-y
ear-old woman and 52-year-old woman. Outcome measures: Proportion of p
reventive care manoeuvres carrying grade A, B, C, D and E recommendati
ons from the Canadian Task Force on the Periodic 1 Health Examination
that were performed, offered or advised. A standard score was computed
based on the performance of grade A and B manoeuvres (good or fair ev
idence for inclusion in the periodic health examination) and the nonpe
rformance of grade D and E manoeuvres (fair or good evidence for exclu
sion from the periodic health examination). Results: Study physicians
performed or offered 65.6% of applicable grade A manoeuvres, 31.0% of
grade B manoeuvres, 22.4% of grade C manoeuvres, 21.8% of grade D mano
euvres and 4.9% of grade E manoeuvres. The provision of evidence-based
preventive care was associated with solo (v. group) practice and capi
tation or salary (v. fee-for-service) payment method. Preventive care
performance was unrelated to physician's sex, certification in family
medicine or problem-based (v. traditional) medical school curriculum.
Conclusions: Preventive care guidelines of the Canadian Task Force on
the Periodic Health Examination have been incompletely integrated into
clinical practice. Research is needed to identify and reduce barriers
to the provision of preventive care and to develop and apply effectiv
e processes for the creation, dissemination and implementation of clin
ical practice guidelines.