Dp. Moore et Na. White, DIFFERENTIATION BETWEEN MUSCULOSKELETAL AND NEUROLOGIC CAUSES OF LAMENESS IN HORSES - 22 CASES (1993-1995), Journal of equine veterinary science, 18(1), 1998, pp. 56-61
Medical records of 78 horses tested for EPM via Western Blot and/or PC
R tests on cerebrospinal fluid between January 1993 and September 1995
were examined, Twenty-two (Group 2) of the 78 horses in which the ori
gin of gait abnormality (musculoskeletal vs neurologic system) could n
ot be clearly determined on initial examination were compared to the r
emaining 56 horses (Group 1). Horses in Group 2 were compared with res
pect to signalment, presenting problem, history, physical examination
findings, results of diagnostic tests, and final diagnosis. Horses in
Group 2 were more likely to be of warmblood breed and to be presented
for lameness or for gait abnormality of uncertain origin (musculoskele
tal vs neurologic). All horses presented for lameness or for gait abno
rmality of uncertain origin whose CSF samples subsequently tested posi
tive for EPM were in Group 2, Horses in Group 2 tended to have multipl
e problems involving mild hind limb lameness and/or mild neurologic de
ficits. Some similarities of unusual movement were observed among case
s where movement description was recorded. There was a marked increase
in positive test results for EPM among Group 2 horses after introduct
ion of the Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) test.