Since the advent of laparoscopic surgery, the number of suits against
surgeons has risen. One of the most frequent complaints is the lack of
sufficient information. Physicians in France have a formal obligation
to provide information in the contractual legal context established s
ince 1936. This notion has been confirmed in several court cases. The
requirement for patient informed consent has been confirmed by several
decisions of the Appeals Court and is stated in the code of deontolog
y. The value of classical oral information has been recently questione
d in certain court cases. We analyse the current legal situation in Fr
ance and try to define the content of information required in the case
of laparoscopic surgery in addition to the way this information is pr
ovided and the means of obtaining informed consent. The information pr
ovided must be personalised. The patient must informed that laparoscop
y remains a surgical operation. It is licit to warn the patient of pre
dictable risks according to statistical probabilities, of the team's e
xperience and of the patients own status including past history and ps
ychological factors. A written statement may be prepared but must rema
in a document complementary to personalized oral information. The surg
eon must obtain and assure good patient comprehension. The surgical co
mmunity should publish risk rates in order for surgeons to have reliab
le references which can be used to define the notion of exceptional ri
sk.