Macrophyte beds of the lake littoral host a diverse community of macro
invertebrates, from primary consumers to top predators. Different macr
ophyte species often support different macroinvertebrate communities.
Complex leaf morphologies (plants with finely dissected leaves) usuall
y support richer and/or more diverse invertebrate assemblages, probabl
y because of the larger availability of microhabitats and refuges (spa
tial heterogeneity) that allow for coexistence of otherwise mutually e
xclusive species. Odonate nymphs are sometimes associated with complex
leaf macrophytes. Because of their wide prey spectrum, colonization o
f spatially heterogeneous macrophyte habitats may be due to a higher p
redation success in such a habitat rather than to the presence of part
icular prey species. Odonate (Enallagma sp.) nymph predation success w
as tested under conditions of high (complex leaf Ceratophyllum demersu
m L. leaf packs) and low (simple leaf Potamogeton illinoensis Morong l
eaf packs) spatial heterogeneity. Prey species included two pulmonate
gastropods, an amphipod, and a turbellarian that were common in the na
tural habitat of Enallagma. Enallagma significantly reduced the amphip
od and the turbellarian populations and the prey assemblage as a whole
, but did not have any statistically significant impact on the snail p
opulations, which increased their absolute and relative abundance in t
he presence of the odonate. Numerical losses by Enallagma predation (i
f any) were not related to macrophyte architecture, suggesting that pr
ey vulnerability to Enallagma predation is species-specific rather tha
n habitat-determined. Enallagma's preferential distribution in spatial
ly heterogeneous macrophyte habitats, when occurring, may be due to ot
her factors such as a refuge from fish predation and/or a generally gr
eater prey availability and diversity in complex leaf than in simple l
eaf macrophyte habitats.