A. Marcinein et S. Vanwijnbergen, THE IMPACT OF CZECH PRIVATIZATION METHODS ON ENTERPRISE PERFORMANCE INCORPORATING INITIAL SELECTION-BIAS CORRECTION, Economics of transition, 5(2), 1997, pp. 289-304
Governments with transitional economies have applied different privati
zation methods, from an almost free distribution to the direct sale of
state assets. While a free distribution was believed to ensure the po
litical feasibility of the programme and its fairness, direct sales, (
or more generally, standard privatization methods) had a significant a
dvantage in creating concentrated ownership structures as the prerequi
site to corporate control and restructuring. Many economists believe t
hat the two goals of mass privatization, political feasibility and the
creation of proper ownership incentives, contradict each other and re
cent empirical comparisons of enterprises seem to support this view. H
owever, all empirical works have been based on the weak assumption tha
t privatization methods were applied on a randomly selected sample of
enterprises, which then allowed for a direct comparison between these
enterprises. Our main claim is that governments actually selected ente
rprises non-randomly and therefore, the resulting selection-bias must
be incorporated into the analyses. To show this, we apply a Heckman tw
o-step regression method on a sample of 559 Czech enterprises. The mai
n point of this paper then is that performance is influenced by the se
lection process and that the combination of vouchers with outsider own
ers is preferred over 100 per cent voucherization.