OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to determine the ability of different indic
ations for cone biopsy to predict the presence of disease in the cone
specimen and the utility of conization for low-grade disease. STUDY DE
SIGN: The records were reviewed of all patients who had an excisional
cone biopsy at Queens Hospital Center between 1984 and 1995. Data were
gathered regarding cytologic studies, visualization of the transforma
tion zone, colposcopically directed biopsy, and endocervical curettage
. The indications for the cone procedure were grouped as being for tre
atment (biopsy-proved disease) (indication A), discrepancy between cyt
ologic and histologic diagnoses (indication B), positive endocervical
curettage results (indication C), and transformation zone not fully vi
sualized (indication D), and combinations of the above. RESULTS: Two t
housand nine hundred sixty-nine records were reviewed. Of these, 604 h
ad cone biopsies. Three hundred twenty-three of 355 (91%) cone biopsie
s done for indication A alone had disease on the cone specimen (define
d as any grade of dysplasia or condyloma). Forty of 47 (85.1%) cone bi
opsies done for indication B alone had disease of the cone specimen. F
orty-three of 46 (93.5%) cone biopsies done for indication C alone had
disease on the cone specimen. Ninety-one cone procedures were done fo
r a combination of indications A and D, with 87 (95.6%) showing diseas
e on the cone specimen. Thirty-one procedures were done for a combinat
ion of indications B and D, with 25 (80.6%) showing disease on the con
e specimen. Cone procedures were done on 32 women for a combination of
indications C and D, and 30 (93.8%) had disease on the cone specimen.
Two cone procedures were done because of the colposcopic appearance a
lone; one had high-grade disease on the cone specimen. Age did not hel
p to predict the likelihood that disease would be found on the cone sp
ecimen. The data were then reanalyzed to determine the likelihood of f
inding high-grade disease (cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grades 2
or 3 or invasive cancer) on the cone specimen. Overall, those with pr
eoperative high-grade cytologic or histologic characteristics (cervica
l intraepithelial neoplasia grades 2 or 3) were much more likely to ha
ve high-grade disease (277/371 [74.7%]) than were those with preoperat
ive low-grade cytologic or histologic characteristics (condyloma or ce
rvical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 1) (49/233 [21.0%]) (p < 0.001)
. CONCLUSION: Neither age nor the preoperative grade of disease are go
od discriminators of the likelihood that disease will be found on a co
nization specimen. However, patients who have high-grade disease on th
e preoperative evaluation are much more likely than those with only lo
w-grade disease to have high-grade dysplasia or cancer on a subsequent
conization.