K. Andersson et al., THE EFFECTS OF FEEDING SYSTEM, LYSINE LEVEL AND GILT CONTACT ON PERFORMANCE, SKATOLE LEVELS AND ECONOMY OF ENTIRE MALE PIGS, Livestock production science, 51(1-3), 1997, pp. 131-140
The study embracing 1528 crossbred entire male (EM), female (F) and ca
strated (C) pigs (26-105 kg live weight, LW) was aimed at studying the
effects of different environmental factors such as feeding system, di
et composition, raising in single-sex and mixed groups, and feeding an
d grouping routines prior to slaughter on performance and backfat skat
ole levels. Furthermore, the profitability of the different sexes was
calculated. The pigs were fed restrictedly a dry or a wet (whey or wat
er) diet containing either 0.85, 0.95 or 1.05% lysine. The evening bef
ore slaughter the pigs were either fed or not. During transport and la
irage before slaughter, one half of the pigs were mixed with unfamilia
r pigs of all sexes, while the other half were handled pen-wise. In co
mparison with C, EM pigs had superior daily weight gain (DWG, +23 g/d)
and feed efficiency (-0.15 kg feed/kg weight gain). In the LW range f
rom 60 kg to slaugther EM raised in groups together with F had a tende
ncy to exhibit a lower DWG, compared with raising in single-sex groups
. Carcass lean meat percentage in EM exceeded that of C by 4.1 units w
hen estimated by partial dissection. In the LW range from start to 60
kg, pigs fed the highest lysine level (1.05%) had a higher DWG than pi
gs fed lower lysine levels (0.85 and 0.95%). Lysine level had no effec
t on carcass lean meat percentage. Wet feeding with whey, but not with
water, reduced backfat skatole levels, in comparison with dry feeding
. Pigs fed the higher vis-a-vis the lower lysine level had higher skat
ole levels in trial 1, whereas in trial 2 there was no effect. Contact
with F pigs in the pen tended to reduce fat skatole level in EM. Neit
her feeding routines nor mixing with unfamiliar pigs prior to slaughte
r affected skatole level in backfat, except for a reduction in nonfed
pigs, mixed with unfamiliar pigs prior to slaughter. Gross margin per
pig place and year did not distinguish EM from C when graded commercia
lly, but was significantly superior for EM when payment was based on d
issected carcass lean meat percentage. (C) 1997 Elsevier Science B.V.