C. Clavel et al., COMPARATIVE-ANALYSIS OF HUMAN-PAPILLOMAVIRUS DETECTION BY HYBRID CAPTURE ASSAY AND ROUTINE CYTOLOGIC SCREENING TO DETECT HIGH-GRADE CERVICAL LESIONS, International journal of cancer, 75(4), 1998, pp. 525-528
A commercial HPV detection test, Hybrid Capture (HC), designed to dete
ct 14 HPV types divided into high-risk and low-risk groups, has been e
valuated. A total of 1064 scrapes from 1028 unselected women attending
routine cytologic screening were tested and results were compared wit
h those of classic cytologic screening and cervical biopsies. The reli
ability of the test was also evaluated on 38 fresh conization samples.
HPV DNA was detected in 108 women (10.5%), including 90 infected by a
high-risk HPV (8.8%); 25 high-grade lesions were detected histologica
lly, and high-risk HPV was found in 16 of these 25 women (64%), and in
27 (71%) of the 38 conization samples. The overall sensitivity of HC
in detecting high-grade SIL on cervical scrapes and conization samples
was 71.2%, while its positive predictive value was 17.8%. Classic cyt
ologic screening appeared to be the most sensitive method (84%) for de
tecting high-grade SIL, with a positive predictive value of 91.3%. The
lower sensitivity of HC limits its use for screening high-grade lesio
ns on a large scale, even though it may be useful for reducing cytolog
ically false-negative results. Moreover, the quantitative approach pro
vided by the HC assay for assessment of the viral load cannot clearly
distinguish among cases with or without high-grade lesions. (C) 1998 W
iley-Liss, Inc.