Mg. Stewart et al., THE EFFECTS OF A PRACTICE GUIDELINE ON ENDOSCOPIC SINUS SURGERY AT ANACADEMIC CENTER, American journal of rhinology, 11(2), 1997, pp. 161-165
Practice guidelines (PG) (or clinical pathways) are increasingly impor
tant tools for standardizing health care delivery, improving efficienc
y, monitoring quality, and controlling costs. Health services research
ers divide the delivery of health care into three stages: structure, p
rocess, and outcome. PGs are a technique to standardize the process of
health care delivery, which may result in improved clinical outcomes
or may maintain clinical outcomes while increasing process efficiency
and decreasing costs. We describe the development and implementation o
f a PG for endoscopic sinus surgery at an academic center, and report
preliminary results on the effects of the PG on the health care proces
s. The PG was developed using a multidisciplinary combination of conse
nsus-building and evidence-based techniques. Initially, participation
in the PG was voluntary and at the attending physician's discretion. O
ne year after implementation of the PG, 41 patients had been enrolled
by members of the medical school's full-time faculty. Process and shor
t-term outcome variables on those patients were compared to a random s
ample of 50 patients treated by the same physicians, but not using the
PG. There was no evidence of selection bias into the PG based on demo
graphics, severity of sinusitis, or the presence of comorbid factors.
There were no differences in time spent in the operating room, postane
sthesia care unit, or day surgery observation unit, between patients u
sing the PG and not using the PG. However, patients not using the PG h
ad a significantly higher rate of unplanned admission. Patients using
the PG had significantly lower median hospital costs and charges than
did patients not using the PG. In addition, median hospital costs and
charges decreased steadily for all patients (not just those using the
PG), simultaneous with the development and implementation of the PG. T
here were no differences in short-term clinical outcomes between PG an
d non-PG patients. In summary, the development and implementation of a
PG for endoscopic sinus surgery resulted in lower hospital costs and
charges while maintaining acceptable short-term clinical outcomes. PGs
have important implications for improving the efficiency of the healt
h care process.