This paper sets up the relations between simple cokriging and ordinary
cokriging with one or several unbiased,less constraints. Differences
between cokriging variants are related to differences between models a
dopted for the means of primary and secondary variables. Because it is
,tot necessary for the secondary data weights to sum to zero, ordinary
cokriging with a single unbiasedness constraint gives a larger weight
to the secondary information while reducing the occurrence of negativ
e weights. Also the weights provided by such cokriging systems written
in terms of covariances or correlograms are nor related linearly, hen
ce the estimates are different. The prediction performances of cokrigi
ng estimators are assessed using an environmental dataset that include
s concentrations of five heavy metals at 359 locations. Analysis of re
estimation scores at 100 test locations shows that kriging and cokrigi
ng perform equally when the primary and secondary variables are sample
d at the same locations. When the secondary information is available a
t the estimated location, one gains little by retaining other distant
secondary data in tile estimation.