In order to shed light on the recent experimental controversy concerni
ng the intermediate pressure phases of Ce we have made systematic elec
tronic structure and total-energy studies on Ce in the experimentally
reported low-pressure phase alpha-Ce (fcc), the intermediate-pressure
alpha-U (alpha'), the body-centered monoclinic [alpha ''(I)], and C-fa
ce-centered monoclinic [alpha ''(II)] phases, together with the stable
high-pressure body-centered tetragonal phase. We also included the bo
dy-centered cubic, hexagonal-close-packed, and omega (hP3) phases. In
this study we used the accurate full-potential linear muffin-tin orbit
al (FPLMTO) method. The optimized structural parameters obtained from
our total-energy studies for the alpha' and alpha ''(II) phases are fo
und to be in good agreement with corresponding experimental values. Th
e structural optimization of the alpha ''(I) phase always yields the f
ee or bet phase stable, depending upon the volume considered. Except f
or an improvement in the equilibrium volume, the generalized gradient
correction reproduces the calculated relative stability between differ
ent phases of Ce at high pressure of the local-density approximation.
Of the experimentally reported intermediate pressure structures [alpha
', alpha ''(I) and alpha ''(II)] we find that the alpha ''(II) phase i
s the most stable. Among the contending phases, alpha' and alpha ''(I)
, the latter is very close in energy to the alpha '' phase whereas the
former is substantially higher in energy. We thus rule out the alpha-
U structure as an intermediate pressure phase of Ce. Our work suggests
that the most probable structural phase transition sequence of Ce met
al is fcc(gamma)-->fcc(alpha)-->alpha ''(II)-->bct, which is consisten
t with current experimental results.