DETECTION OF SIMULATED CHEST LESIONS WITH NORMAL AND REDUCED RADIATION-DOSE - COMPARISON OF CONVENTIONAL SCREEN-FILM RADIOGRAPHY AND A FLAT-PANEL X-RAY-DETECTOR BASED ON AMORPHOUS-SILICON
M. Strotzer et al., DETECTION OF SIMULATED CHEST LESIONS WITH NORMAL AND REDUCED RADIATION-DOSE - COMPARISON OF CONVENTIONAL SCREEN-FILM RADIOGRAPHY AND A FLAT-PANEL X-RAY-DETECTOR BASED ON AMORPHOUS-SILICON, Investigative radiology, 33(2), 1998, pp. 98-103
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES. The authors compared a solid-state amorphous
silicon (a-Si) detector and screen-film radiography (SFR) with regard
to the detection of simulated pulmonary lesions. Evaluation of the im
pact of a dose reduction of 50% with this digital flat-panel detector
was of special interest. METHODS. A self-scanning flat-panel detector,
based on a-Si technology with 143 x 143 mu m pixel size, 1 k x 1 k ma
trix and 12-bit digital output was used. An asymmetric state-of-the-ar
t screen-film system was compared with a-Si images taken at the same d
ose as SFR-images and at a dose reduced by 50%. An anthropomorphic che
st phantom was superimposed by templates containing nodules, linear st
ructures, reticular, and micronodular opacities in a random distributi
on. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed for 23,04
0 observations made by four independent observers. Student's t test (9
5% confidence-level) was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS. Recei
ver operating characteristic analysis showed that a-Si images taken at
the same dose as SFR-images were significantly superior to SFR with r
espect to the detectability of lines (P = 0.01) and micronodular opaci
ties (P < 0.01). For the other objects and the a-Si images taken at a
reduced dose, it yielded no statistically significant differences betw
een both imaging modalities. CONCLUSIONS. The results of this phantom
study indicate that a-Si detector technology holds promise in terms of
dose reduction in chest radiography without loss of diagnostic accura
cy compared with SFR.