G. Fountzilas et al., A RANDOMIZED STUDY OF EPIRUBICIN MONOTHERAPY EVERY 4 OR EVERY 2 WEEKSIN ADVANCED BREAST-CANCER - A HELLENIC COOPERATIVE ONCOLOGY GROUP-STUDY, Annals of oncology, 8(12), 1997, pp. 1213-1220
Purpose: To evaluate the impact on the response rate in patients with
advanced breast cancer (ABC) of the doubling of the dose intensity (DI
) of epirubicin monotherapy. Patients and methods. From January 1991 u
ntil April 1996, 167 patients with ABC were randomized to receive epir
ubicin (110 mg/m(2)) either every four (81 patients, group A) or every
two weeks (86 patients, group B). Filgrastim (5 mu g/kg/daily) was ad
ministered prophylactically on days 2-12 of each cycle. Results. The t
wo groups were equally balanced in terms of major patient and tumor ch
aracteristics. Even though the median cumulative dose of epirubicin wa
s identical in the two groups (651 mg/m(2)), the median DI of epirubic
in was doubled in group B (27.2 vs. 52.9 mg/m(2)/wk, respectively). Th
e complete response (CR) rate was significantly increased in group B (
5%, 95% CI: 0.16%-9.84% vs, 17%, 95% CI: 8.9%-25.08%, P = 0.011), alth
ough overall response rates were similar (49% vs. 53%, P = 0.5957). Al
so, there was no significant difference in the incidence of grade 3-4
toxicity between the two groups. After a median follow-up of 25 months
(range, 0.43-43.3+) no significant difference was observed in the dur
ation of response (median, 10 months vs, 8.5 months, P = 0.5130), time
to progression (median, 7.2 months vs. 7.4 months, P = 0.2970) or sur
vival (median, 14.6 months vs, 14.9 months, P = 0.4483). Logistic regr
ession analysis showed that performance status was a significant varia
ble for response (P = 0.0068) and multivariate analysis using the Cox
proportional hazards model revealed that performance status was signif
icant for survival (P = 0.0049), while the presence of multiple metast
ases (P = 0.0020) was significant for time to progression. Conclusion.
Doubling the planned DI of epirubicin monotherapy significantly incre
ases the CR rate but has no influence on time to progression or surviv
al in patients with ABC.