EXPERIENCE WITH INTRAPERITONEAL CISPLATIN AND ETOPOSIDE AND IV SODIUMTHIOSULFATE PROTECTION IN OVARIAN-CANCER PATIENTS WITH EITHER PATHOLOGICALLY COMPLETE RESPONSE OR MINIMAL RESIDUAL DISEASE
Ren. Vanrijswijk et al., EXPERIENCE WITH INTRAPERITONEAL CISPLATIN AND ETOPOSIDE AND IV SODIUMTHIOSULFATE PROTECTION IN OVARIAN-CANCER PATIENTS WITH EITHER PATHOLOGICALLY COMPLETE RESPONSE OR MINIMAL RESIDUAL DISEASE, Annals of oncology, 8(12), 1997, pp. 1235-1241
Background. High-dose platinum-based regimens can produce responses in
patients not responding to standard chemotherapy. As in many ovarian
cancer patients the disease remains confined to the peritoneal cavity,
intraperitoneal (i.p.) chemotherapy has been applied as an alternativ
e approach to increase drug exposure. The delivery of cytotoxic agents
to the peritoneal cavity can lead to high drug concentrations intrape
ritoneally with less systemic toxicity. This study aimed at evaluating
the efficacy and toxicity of high-dose i.p. cisplatin plus etoposide
and intravenous sodium thiosulphate protection in ovarian cancer. Pati
ents and methods. Patients with either a pathologically complete respo
nse (pCR) after first-line treatment or with persistent disease after
first-line platinum-based chemotherapy or abdominal recurrences were e
ligible. All intraabdominal lesions had to be < 2 cm at the start of i
.p. treatment. The treatment consisted of etoposide 350 mg/m(2) i.p. f
ollowed by cisplatin 200 mg/m(2) i.p. with intravenous sodium thiosulp
hate (4 g/m(2) bolus, followed by 12 g/m(2) over six hours) protection
. Four courses of i.p. treatment were administered in case of pCR and
6 courses otherwise, at four-weekly intervals. Results. The study comp
rised 29 patients, six patients with pCR, 17 patients with persistent
disease and six patients with abdominal recurrences. They received a t
otal of 105 courses of treatment (65% of the scheduled number of cours
es). Twelve patients completed scheduled treatment, illustrating its f
easibility. In 17 patients treatment had to be prematurely stopped bec
ause of inflow obstruction (seven patients), bowel perforation (two pa
tients), renal toxicity (two patients), neurotoxicity (two patients),
or malaise and vomiting (four patients). One patient with bowel perfor
ation died of this complication. Severe nausea and vomiting occurred i
n 51% of cycles. Leukopenia and thrombopenia grade 3 and 4 occurred in
30% and 6% of cycles, respectively. Ototoxicity of cisplatin was meas
ured by serial tone audiography in 23 patients: only eight patients (3
5%) showed significant audiographic changes, although none of them dev
eloped clinical hearing loss. Fifteen patients were evaluable for resp
onse: four pCR, five PR, two SD, four PD. The median duration of Freed
om from progression was 616 days and the median overall survival 1065
days from the start of treatment. Conclusions: High-dose i.p. treatmen
t with cisplatin and etoposide can be associated with significant toxi
cities. Major clinical problems are nausea, vomiting, and the formatio
n of intraabdominal adhesions. Intravenous sodium thiosulphate effecti
vely reduces the systemic toxicity of high-dose cisplatin. The value o
f high-dose i.p, treatment is uncertain and its routine use cannot be
recommended.