A RANDOMIZED STUDY COMPARING AIR TO ECHOVIST(R) AS A CONTRAST-MEDIUM IN THE ASSESSMENT OF TUBAL PATENCY IN INFERTILE WOMEN USING TRANSVAGINAL SALPINGOSONOGRAPHY

Citation
H. Spalding et al., A RANDOMIZED STUDY COMPARING AIR TO ECHOVIST(R) AS A CONTRAST-MEDIUM IN THE ASSESSMENT OF TUBAL PATENCY IN INFERTILE WOMEN USING TRANSVAGINAL SALPINGOSONOGRAPHY, Human reproduction, 12(11), 1997, pp. 2461-2464
Citations number
12
Categorie Soggetti
Reproductive Biology","Obsetric & Gynecology
Journal title
ISSN journal
02681161
Volume
12
Issue
11
Year of publication
1997
Pages
2461 - 2464
Database
ISI
SICI code
0268-1161(1997)12:11<2461:ARSCAT>2.0.ZU;2-Q
Abstract
This study was undertaken to compare two different contrast media (air and Echovist(R)) in the assessment of tubal patency using transvagina l salpingosonography (TSSG) in 32 infertile women referred to an infer tility outpatient clinic. Altogether, 59 Fallopian tubes were examined with TSSG. Laparoscopic chromopertubation was used as a reference met hod. In group A (air), concordance was 90%, Cohen's kappa coefficient 0.71 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.64-0.77], sensitivity 63%, speci ficity 100%, negative predictive value 88% and positive predictive val ue 100%. In group B (Echovist(R)), the corresponding parameters were a s follows: 93%, 0.71 (CI: 0.67-0.76), 60, 100, 93 and 100% respectivel y. No statistically significant differences were found between these t wo contrast media. Either one can reliably be used for assessing tubal patency with TSSG in infertile women as a primary phase examination m odality.